Quantcast
    Posts     Comments

UFC 88 Results

ufc

Recent Comments

Top Commenters

  
  • roy (927)
  • tom (877)
  • dane drebin (555)
  • kom34 (483)
  • derek (454)
  • Steve (390)
  • Kash (375)
  • Ryan S (367)
  • Brandon (352)
  • Morey (343)

Categories

Archives



« Rampage Jackson Gets Revenge On A Blogger | Main | Strikeforce: Frank Shamrock vs. Cung Le Weigh-In Results »

UFC 85: Mike Swick vs. Marcus Davis

By CagE | March 28, 2008

mike swick

According to MMAJunkie, Mike “Quick” Swick (11-2) will take on Marcus “The Irish Handgrenade” Davis (14-3) at UFC 85 on June 7 from the O2 Arena in London, England.

Joe Cavallaro, who represents Davis, confirmed with MMAjunkie.com that they’ve signed a bout agreement for the fight. Additionally, Swick today confirmed on MySpace that he has also signed on for the fight.

Topics: News, Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) |

TERMS OF USE: Comments here on CageToday are for intelligent MMA discussion ONLY. Comments using excessive cursing or racist statements will be DELETED.

6 Responses to “UFC 85: Mike Swick vs. Marcus Davis”

  1. Kash Says:
    March 28th, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    I can’t wait for this fight.

  2. pops Says:
    March 28th, 2008 at 1:54 pm

    i think Quick is gonna take it

  3. Nate Fury Says:
    March 28th, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    This is going to be a sick fight! I’m going with Davis for the win.

  4. kom34 Says:
    March 28th, 2008 at 3:48 pm

    i going to be rooting for davis because he has worked his way up so much. but i like swick and hope he does well in his new division.

  5. tom Says:
    March 29th, 2008 at 9:25 am

    dude swick also worked his way up when he was in the middle weight.. idk who is going to be cause davis has strong punchs and is very strong and swick doesnt do well vs strong ppl but swick has some fast and ko power also and i think hes a better MMA striker but idk who is better on the ground but its a test for them both

  6. derek Says:
    March 29th, 2008 at 10:18 am

    mike swick will lay down the law.

Comments