Comments on: UFC 106 “Ortiz vs Griffin 2″ Results LIVE

By: Nate Fury

Nate Fury — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:42:16 +0000

Who should Rich Franklin fight next? Keith Jardine, Chuck Liddell or Tito Ortiz? Remember Rich got the decision on Wandy, but Jardine was KO’ed by Wandy. Would be a good fight between Rich and Jardine I think. Both Rich and Chuck got the decision on Wandy. Chuck and Rich would be a good fight as well. Rich and Ortiz have the most common opponents out of the 3. Both fought Shamrock, Belfort, Machida and Wandy. Rich going 2-2 against common opponents, while Ortiz went 5-1 (including 3 wins against Shamrock).

By: roy

roy — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:20:41 +0000

no way was the 3rd round a 10-7 or even a 10-8 yeah forrest clearly won that round because tito did nothing but its not like forrest just beat him bloody or was doing heavey damage on him.

By: Ryan S

Ryan S — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:22:50 +0000

I don’t know Steve, I thought it was extremely close again, but I was pretty certain that Forrest won it. Only because of that third round though. I thought Tito was just that inactive that I figured it 10-7. He really didn’t do or try much, including counter punching.

By: steve

steve — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:38:00 +0000

The first round of the last fight was as 1 sided a round as you will ever see. And it wasnt ruled a 10-8. So I dont see how the 3rd round in this fight could have been. Forrest won the 3rd and lost the first 2. But the first fight could have gone either way. And whats crazy is forrest said he went back and watched the first fight and he saw that he lost. Even though he thought he won after the fight was over. I think the first fight was much closer than this one. Again terrible judging and Miko for you to act like there is no way forrest lost just makes you look very very stupid and an obvious Tito hater. Let me guess your favorite fighter is Chuck Liddell.

By: Hall

Hall — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:54:10 +0000

tito and forest fight had to be like that so we can pay to see the best out of three fights. I figured it would be like this its starting to sound like we are watching a show instead of an event, shows are made for the people watching and twisted for the people watching so that we will come back for more. It seems lately all deceisions in ufc suck hell ,I was going for forest but I just dont see how he won.I know he lost the first two rounds. Third round Forest deffinetly won.

By: rory

rory — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:06:28 +0000

“i would rather see both fighters get a draw that one fighter get fucked over bad”…very true but will never happen

By: STEVEO

STEVEO — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:08:16 +0000

I am a forrest fan, the only way I could see that fight going in forrests favor is IF (and a big IF) tito won the first two 10-9 and forrest won the third 10-8 and I don’t think he did enought to win the third by two. Can’t let it go to decision, these judges prove time and time again that THEY DON’T HAVE A FUCKING CLUE! its just unfortunate, i would rather see both fighters get a draw than one fighter get fucked over bad.

By: Miko

Miko — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:16:16 +0000

“your an idiot”
Hahahaha self owned

By: steve

steve — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:00:18 +0000

for oswald gobblecock: (“Seriously though how did the 1 judge give it a 30-27? Just pathetic.”

Maybe it was the same judge that gave Tito all 3 rounds in the 1st fight and he was feeling guilty.)

This is Dana breaking down the fight. I love how he says “The 30-27 score is outrageous,” White said. “It’s insane.” Yet when I say it on a post that the score is crazy someone that is just a Forrest fanboy speaks and tries to act like it wasnt a big deal. Love how people cant watch a fight without bias and have no real clue what was going on. Both fights were close and if you think Forrest clearly won either your an idiot.

By: Scooby-Doo

Scooby-Doo — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:32:56 +0000

i had tito in round 1(close thou) and 2, 3 went 2 griffin a entertaining fight. The pre fights on spike were also entertaining. If they do a three put it on the pre fights.